The world has changed almost out of recognition in the last 100 years, yet we still depend on technologies that were introduced so long ago that their age is somewhat uncertain. The earliest ploughs date from before 5000 BC, while the earliest transport wheels date from around 3200 BC. Where would we be today if those technologies were discarded simply because of their extreme age? Two other technologies are now around 110 years old: the airplane and the automobile. Can we discard them?
There is a technology that is less than 80 years old worldwide, but less than about 60 years old in the Americas, that is all too often condemned simply as “old,” with no further justification seen to be required. And the most influential people doing the condemning are, astonishingly, audiologists and dispensing professionals, for the technology in question is the hearing loop system (audio-frequency induction-loop system). This system communicates by magnetic induction, live speech or music or recordings, direct to hearing aids fitted with telecoils and with the telecoil program enabled.
Unfortunately, due to misapprehensions (fostered by the complacency and prejudice of non-professionals), many hearing care professionals are unaware of the immense boon hearing-loop systems are to their patients. There is a very active “Loop America” movement ; however, in spite of glowing testimonials from hearing aid users introduced to hearing loops, there is an ongoing struggle against misinformation. For example, it is claimed that Bluetooth is a substitute for hearing loops. It very definitely isn’t; Bluetooth is basically a one-to-one communication system. Hearing loops are one-to-many (a single speaker in an auditorium) or many-to-many (a choir in a concert hall or place-of-worship).
There are two other communication systems for assistive hearing that are not limited to one-to-one: FM radio and infra-red. Both of these do not communicate with the hearing aid—the users have to obtain and wear special receivers which have to be provided and maintained by the managers of the venue. The additional receivers are very often socially unacceptable to the people who need them, so are simply not used.
Hearing care professionals would be well-advised to see hearing loops as an opportunity to give a more comprehensive service, by recommending and providing hearing aids with telecoils, and having in their offices a simple hearing loop system fed from a TV set, so that patients can immediately experience the advantages.
— John Woodgate, BSc(Eng), CEng, MIET,
SMIEEE, FAES, Hon FInstSCE
As an audiologist who has been in practice for many years and started my practice when hearing aids were analog I understand the concept of the telecoil. Today I feel so strongly about the miracle of a tiny telecoil I have opened my own induction loop company so I can advocate for the installation of hearing loops everywhere. Hearing loops need to be global. Be an advocate and help loop the world. Carol Letzter Aud, Audiologist
To think that people who sell hearing aids don’t want the people who buy them to know about the value telecoils is a bit like a dentist drilling decay from a tooth’s cavity and not filling it! Along with many other in the United States, I’ve been fighting this amazing educational ‘battle’ for over 3 decades since I first learned what a difference telecoils and loop systems could make for me in places where I want to hear. Try church, educational settings, performing arts centers, theaters, and any other setting where someone needs to block background noise in order to hear well. It’s truly a shame that this has been such an uphill battle. I’m thankful that I’ve had the advantage of telecoils since learning about them through The Hearing Loss Assn. of America way back in 1984! Thanks for writing this article John. Maybe it will shake a few seller’s souls out there. Julie Olson Neenah Wisconsin